<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cinematic Attic &#187; Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinematicattic.com/?cat=9&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinematicattic.com</link>
	<description>100% Organic, Home-Grown, Artisanal, Locally-Sourced Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 06:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Bill Hicks</title>
		<link>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2199</link>
		<comments>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2199#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Hicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitzman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Hicks was a comedian from Texas who rose to at prominence in the 80s. He was "controversial," in that he talked a lot about politics, society, and drugs. He unleashed his wrath on the first two, and as for drugs, he was a major opponent of the hypocrisy surrounding drugs. Although his comedy could be angry, bitter, and often vulgar, he still strangely seemed to come at the whole thing from a place of love and compassion (hence the book's title). His comedy seemed to reflect an exasperation at the decline of society, but he seemed to genuinely want to change things for the better. <a href="http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2199">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2201" style="width: 586px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/8442793636_8a420dda76_z.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-2201 " alt="8442793636_8a420dda76_z" src="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/8442793636_8a420dda76_z.jpg" width="576" height="385" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I&#8217;m about 96% sure I stole this picture idea from my fellow Cinematic Attic writer Jessica. I&#8217;m about 93% comfortable with that. What can I say, it&#8217;s a good idea!</p></div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Alternate Title: <em>Ryan Reviews&#8230;A Book?!?</em> Yes, a book. But it does have some connections to movies. I have previously talked a bit about books, movies, and the transition between one and the other, but this is the first review in which I&#8217;ll talk specifically about a book.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As you may or may not (but probably &#8220;not&#8221;) know, I&#8217;ve been doing a book-reading project the last two years called &#8220;<a href="http://sitzblog.com/sitzbook/">Sitzbook</a>.&#8221; In my project I read a book a week and then do a bit of a write-up about it. This year&#8217;s first book was <em>Bill Hicks: Love All The People</em>, a sort of anthology of stand-up routines and other material by Bill Hicks, one of the greatest comedians ever, in my opinion.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;ll get back to the book in a minute and throw some big quotes at you, but first let&#8217;s get a bit of background information out there. Bill Hicks was a comedian from Texas who rose to at prominence in the late 80s. He was &#8220;controversial&#8221; in that he talked a lot about politics, society, and drugs. He unleashed his wrath on the first two, and as for drugs, he was a major opponent of the hypocrisy surrounding drugs. Although his comedy could be angry, bitter, and often vulgar, he still strangely seemed to come at the whole thing from a place of love and compassion (hence the book&#8217;s title). His comedy seemed to reflect an exasperation at the decline of society, but he seemed to genuinely want to change things for the better:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/iMUiwTubYu0" height="315" width="420" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As part of the change he was seeking, it was only natural that Hicks set his sights on the politicians and the political and social issues of the day. A lot of his criticism was certainly directed towards the first Iraq war and the first President Bush, who was in power during Hicks&#8217; heyday, but he also criticized the Democrats and politicians in general (he talked a LOT about the Kennedy assassination and called Bill Clinton and Janet Reno &#8220;mass murderers&#8221; because of their response to Waco, so it&#8217;d be a stretch to call him a puppet of the left).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Strangely, even though so much of his material focused on life in the US, he gained a lot more of a following in the UK than in America. Still, I personally know a lot of Americans who think he was great, so he must have been <em>really</em> big overseas. Unfortunately, though, he died of cancer in 1994. I didn&#8217;t hear of him until 2002, when I visited my friend Brian in Munich and almost passed out from laughing while listening to Hicks&#8217; albums. That was at least 10 years after a lot of the material on <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0382805/">those albums</a>, and now another 10 years has passed. Yet almost none of the material seems dated; in fact, some of the bits seem almost eerily prescient, as we&#8217;re still dealing with a lot of the same problems Hicks talked about (such as gun control, politics, and Billy Ray Cyrus).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For example, gun violence was as much of a problem in the US in Hicks&#8217; time as it is today. When reading the book after a 2012 full of prominent shootings, I was struck by how little has changed. Hicks also talked about gun control and after quoting the second amendment, he comments that:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;<em>This sentence, this </em>one<em> idea, this complete thought in and of itself does </em>not<em> say every Floyd, Clem, or Burl has the right to bear arms. It does </em>not<em> say every psychopathic yahoo in the country should be able to own a gun. It doesn’t say that </em>at all<em>, and anyone with an education higher than the first grade should be able to comprehend this. Again, I believe people </em>should<em> be able to glean the true meaning of a simple sentence before we even </em>begin<em> to discussing their owning automatic weapons for &#8216;hunting purposes.&#8217;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>[&#8230;] A child could explain this to you if he or she wasn’t busy ducking for cover, or being strip-searched on the way into their grade school.<br />
Here is the problem as I see it—a lot of very fearful and confused people in this world are heading towards realizing their own self-fulfilling prophecy. They’re advocating a right that does not exist (at least constitutionally, as we’ve seen) to arm themselves to the teeth and ‘protect’ themselves from unnamed predators who, they believe, want nothing more than to break into their homes, rape their fat wives, and then steal all their bowling trophies.</em>&#8216;&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If you think about it, that could have been written today, and seeing as he said it years before Columbine and all the shootings that it preceded, his comments about schools are almost chilling. It&#8217;s provocative, dark, and bitterly funny at the end, which is a good description of his style (and Hicks himself, for that matter).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Drugs are another thing that Hicks loved to talk about, and they come up in the book and in his routines a lot:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vX1CvW38cHA" height="315" width="420" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">His biggest pet peeve was hypocrisy and its myriad forms, and this came up often when he talked about drugs. For example, the book contains many interviews that Hicks took part in, and here&#8217;s what he said in one of them about drug use in general:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;<em>You have all this hype and all these shows about the terrible drug wars that are going on in America and in-between you have all these alcohol commercials. Come on, you can’t tell me that you don’t see the irony there. Cigarettes kill more people than all illegal drugs combined times 100. This is a fact and there is no way we can weasel around it</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">He also lashed out more at cigarettes and alcohol and the hypocrisy surrounding them in his stand-up gigs. The following quote from a routing naturally<em> </em>looks a bit strange in print, but if you watch or listen to Hicks perform the words it has even more impact:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;<em>I got some other shocking information. Tell you this? I know you don’t know this, so I feel it’s my duty to tell you, thus to pass on knowledge: alcohol brrrrrrrrrr is a FUCKIN’ DRUG!&#8230; a). b) –and here comes the big one – brrrrrrrrrr alcohol kills more people than crack, coke, and heroin COMBINED EACH YEAR! […] ‘It’s OK to drink your drug. Ha ho, yeah! We meant those other drugs. Those untaxed drugs. Those are the bad ones.’ […]</em><br />
<em> My life is infinitely better now that I’ve quit taking drugs. But my life would be infinitely worse had I ever been arrested for taking drugs. That’s my fucking point.</em>&#8220;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s pretty obvious that I thought the book was good, although due to its nature (an extensive compilation) a few of the routines collected in the book can get a bit repetitive. But that&#8217;s hardly Hicks&#8217; fault&#8211;it&#8217;s just how comedy works. If you want a quicker fix, though, I&#8217;d recommend the excellent movie biography called <em><a href="http://www.americanthemovie.com/">American: The Bill Hicks Story,</a> </em>which I watched recently. It has selections of Hicks&#8217; material, but it also tells his interesting story, and it makes the fact that he died so young (at the age of 32) that much more sad.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So, whether it&#8217;s through <em>American</em>, one of Hicks&#8217; stand-up CDs, or this book, I&#8217;d recommend you check out this brilliant comedian that we lost far too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinematicattic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2199</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postapocalyterature</title>
		<link>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=656</link>
		<comments>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=656#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dystopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dystopian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitzman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinematicattic.com/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been fairly quiet around here this week&#8230; almost too quiet. If Cinematic Attic were a movie, I&#8217;d be walking down a deserted street, sidestepping newspapers proclaiming an imminent zombie apocalypse. I&#8217;d have no idea how I got here, and &#8230; <a href="http://cinematicattic.com/?p=656">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s been fairly quiet around here this week&#8230; almost <em>too</em> quiet. If Cinematic Attic were a movie, I&#8217;d be walking down a deserted street, sidestepping newspapers proclaiming an imminent zombie apocalypse. I&#8217;d have no idea how I got here, and I&#8217;d have no idea what to do. Then suddenly, a mutant vampire would grab at my leg from a sewer grate!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OK, I guess it&#8217;s not been <em>that</em> quiet here, and I imagine we writers got all hot and bothered for the Oscars and then ended up taking this week off to recover from our fainting spells (since most of the writers for Cinematic Attic are old-fashioned Dandies through and through). Plus, I have a feeling I&#8217;ve been thinking about dystopian futures more than usual lately.</p>
<div id="attachment_661" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/8463629722_8ded3aec2e_z.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-661 " alt="The &quot;Cover-inside-the-cover&quot; of Veronica Roth's &quot;Divergent&quot;" src="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/8463629722_8ded3aec2e_z.jpg" width="512" height="342" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The &#8220;Cover-inside-the-cover&#8221; of Veronica Roth&#8217;s &#8220;Divergent&#8221;</p></div>
<p class="size-full wp-image-659" style="text-align: justify;">As a side note (and a bit of inevitable self-promotion), I&#8217;m reading a book a week again this year (<a href="http://sitzblog.com/sitzbook/">you can see the list here</a>). It just occurred to me recently that a lot of the books that I&#8217;ve been reading lately &#8211;and indeed, a lot of books that are popular in general&#8211; deal with alternate, post-apocalyptic futures. And that has also affected the types of movies that are being made, too.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For example, this year so far I&#8217;ve already read Veronica Roth&#8217;s <em>Divergent</em> and Stephen King&#8217;s <em>The Gunslinger</em>, both of which are part of series that explore a world after some kind of catastrophic event. And in the last two years of my project I also read such titles as <em>Apocalyp</em>se<em> Z: The Beginning</em>, <em>Cloud Atlas</em>, <em>Ready Player One</em>, <em>The Stand</em>, and the three books from the <em>Hunger Games</em> series. But if I had to list the movies that dealt with these kinds of topics, the list would be so long I&#8217;d have to do it on a separate post.</p>
<div id="attachment_659" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/1453160587_93e4c3ea6b_o.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-659" alt="OK, to be honest, I only read the novelization of this one." src="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/1453160587_93e4c3ea6b_o.jpg" width="500" height="337" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">OK, to be honest, I only read the novelization of this one.</p></div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I was surprised, then, when I was recently talking to two other Cinematic Attic contributors who happen to have a baby. I&#8217;ll give you 5 extra points if you can figure out who I&#8217;m referring to. Anyhow, they told me that ever since having their child, they don&#8217;t like to read dystopian or post-apocalyptic novels. I thought that was interesting, and although I&#8217;m definitely hesitant to second-guess them seeing as I have no kids of my own, I think that such novels and movies could be a good way to deal with the realities of now, by seeing how crappy the future might be if we mess things up.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Then again, that might just make a new parent more stressed. I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Anyhow, it was just a thought, and I wanted to share it with everyone to see what kinds of comments you had.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here are my lists, by the way, since I know a lot of us are into that:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">RYAN&#8217;S TOP 5 DYSTOPIAN NOVELS THAT HE CAN THINK OF ON THE FLY AND LIST WITHOUT PUTTING TOO MUCH EFFORT INTO IT</span>:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">5. <em>Ready Player One</em> &#8211; Ernest Cline: A double win, as it combines a depressing future in Oklahoma with fervent 80s nostalgia.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">4. <em>World War Z</em> &#8211; Max Brooks: This guy really did his homework.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">3. <em>The Road</em> &#8211; Cormac McCarthy: Lock up the booze and guns before reading.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">2. <em>Brave New Fahrenheit 1984</em> &#8211; 3 Authors: The three times I&#8217;ve read these, I read them together, so I just think of them as one giant, awesome bummer.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">1. <em>The Stand</em> &#8211; Stephen King: One of my favorite books ever.</p>
<div id="attachment_660" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/1468056505_42a2ae0ba8_o.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-660" alt="1468056505_42a2ae0ba8_o" src="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/1468056505_42a2ae0ba8_o.jpg" width="500" height="291" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Escape from THIS, Harry Dean Stanton! (If that really is your real name)</p></div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">RYAN&#8217;S TOP 5 DYSTOPIAN OR POST-APOCALYPTIC MOVIES THAT HE CAN SORTA MAKE UP AS HE GOES ALONG</span>:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">5. <em>Cloud Atlas</em>: This would be higher (and in the book section, as well), but over half the novel takes place in the past.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">4. <em>Death Race 2000</em>: I&#8217;d say the title says it all, but it leaves out two things: &#8220;David&#8221; and &#8220;Carradine.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">3. <em>Legends of the Fall</em>: I shudder to think of a future in which I&#8217;d need to watch this shitty movie again.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">2. <em>Children of Men</em>: A future with no need for birth control.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">1. <em>Blade Runner</em>: Mainly since it&#8217;s great, and because everyone always uses it as a touchstone for talking about dystopian futures.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I also want to end with a few questions. Please answer in the form of a complete sentence.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">1. Do you like post-apocalyptic or dystopian novels and movies? If so, why? If not, why, and what&#8217;s the matter with you? What it is about their topic matter (or our human nature) that makes them so popular?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">2. What titles or movies have you enjoyed, and which haven&#8217;t you liked? Explain.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">That&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve got for you today. Have a great rest of the weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinematicattic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=656</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sitzman: Book Vs. Movie: &#8220;Casino Royale&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=35</link>
		<comments>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=35#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino Royale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitzman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinematicattic.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(She&#8217;s not really purple, though. This isn&#8217;t Star Wars.) I&#8217;ll try to write a short, fast review for this, but that&#8217;s what I say every time. OK, I just recently read Casino Royale by Ian Fleming for Sitzbook. It was OK; &#8230; <a href="http://cinematicattic.com/?p=35">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-972DWbU979I/ULzj27PI_xI/AAAAAAAAHOw/cKOom3pfVcQ/s1600/casino-royale-penguin-book-cover.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-972DWbU979I/ULzj27PI_xI/AAAAAAAAHOw/cKOom3pfVcQ/s400/casino-royale-penguin-book-cover.jpg" width="250" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">(She&#8217;s not really purple, though. This isn&#8217;t Star Wars.)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="text-align: center;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;ll try to write a short, fast review for this, but that&#8217;s what I say every time.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">OK, I just recently read <i>Casino Royale</i> by Ian Fleming for <a href="http://sitzblog.blogspot.com/p/sitzbook.html">Sitzbook</a>. It was OK; not that great, but also somehow addicting. It was published in 1953, and the (2nd) movie version came out in 2006, so there are obviously going to be some differences, especially in things like technology. But the movie was <i>very </i>different.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">The main characters are the same, at least in name. You&#8217;ve got James Bond, Vesper Lynd, Le Chiffre, M, and Mathis. And there is a high stakes card game at a casino where Bond is trying to defeat Le Chiffre. That part of the movie starts about 1 hour into the movie, but what comes before that is <i>absolutely</i> different from the book. In fact, it&#8217;s not in the book at all. Bond fights a guy on a skyscraper in Madagascar. Bond goes to the Bahamas to seduce some lady to get closer to her terrorist husband. Bond foils a terrorist plot to blow up a prototype airliner in Miami. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">All that is the first hour of the movie, and it&#8217;s completely unnecessary. It&#8217;s supposedly a set-up to help us understand the background of Le Chiffre and the type of people he runs with, but still, Fleming was able to establish all that in about two paragraphs. That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s not fun, since it is, but then <i>after</i> all that you still have a 1.5 hour movie to get through. The people who made the movie should have just stuck with the <i>Casino Royale</i> story, which is followed fairly closely after that point. There are some differences like location (book is France, movie is Montenegro), and the ending is completely different, but I also understand they needed to make it look cool and sexy, and it&#8217;s a lot easier to watch an action scene than to read one.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://photo-bugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Movies_Films_C_Casino_Royale_009497_1.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="300" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XmWkKGW2QXI/ULzkG61rJ7I/AAAAAAAAHO4/C-Z9ebSrCvo/s400/Movies_Films_C_Casino_Royale_009497_1.jpg" width="400" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: justify;">Eva Green (center) and Daniel Craig (right) with a dog (front). I don&#8217;t remember the dog in the movie, but he could have been the guy helping out the croupier.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="text-align: justify;">So, which is better, the book or the movie? I&#8217;d say the movie, but only if you start at about 55 minutes in. They should have just used those 55 minutes and added them to the next Bond movie, because the rest of the story is well done. Daniel Craig is a great James Bond, although I must admit I&#8217;ve only seen a few Bond movies and don&#8217;t really care that much about the Bond character. So, I&#8217;ll correct that: Daniel Craig is a cool actor and I like how he plays Bond. I also like how Eva Green plays Vesper. Much stronger and confident, much less stupid and useless than in the book (again, it was written in 1953, so I realize times have changed).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;d give the book 10 stars out of 17. I&#8217;d give the first 55 minutes of the movie 7 stars out of 17, and the second part 12 stars out of 17. </div>
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cRMSHRfG6lg/T7U1ETYKYAI/AAAAAAAABhg/ABMQQ-mWgak/s1600/Casino+Royale.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pa-S1dIS8Kg/ULzkztAD7NI/AAAAAAAAHPA/cCscd0UM0FY/s400/Casino+Royale.jpg" width="262" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: justify;">Yeah, yeah, I know I should see the 1960s movie version, too, if I really want to compare these. But one thing at a time, guys. </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Have a good week, everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinematicattic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=35</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
