<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cinematic Attic &#187; Scary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinematicattic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=scary" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinematicattic.com</link>
	<description>100% Organic, Home-Grown, Artisanal, Locally-Sourced Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 06:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Three &#8220;Scary&#8221; Movies You&#8217;ve Probably Already Seen</title>
		<link>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2600</link>
		<comments>http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2600#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psycho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitzman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've watched a few movies in the last couple days since Netflix here in Costa Rica started putting a little tag on the movies if they'll be expiring at the end of the month. All three of these are in that category. <a href="http://cinematicattic.com/?p=2600">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;ve watched a few movies in the last couple days since Netflix here in Costa Rica started putting a little tag on the movies if they&#8217;ll be expiring at the end of the month. All three of these are in that category.</p>
<div id="attachment_2602" style="width: 410px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/19929-04.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2602" alt="19929-04" src="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/19929-04.jpg" width="400" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">It&#8217;s a bit hard to see, but apparently Sully&#8217;s name in the French version is &#8220;Jacques Sullivent.&#8221; Celine Dion must be stopped.</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Movie:</strong> <em>Monsters, Inc.</em><strong><em> </em><br />
When You Probably Saw It: </strong>10 years ago, like everyone else.<strong><br />
Comments: </strong>This is supposedly a kids movie, but it&#8217;s also a Pixar movie, so of course everyone loves it. We also liked it quite a bit, since the whole core concept was pretty unique.<strong><br />
Rating:</strong> 14/17</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Movie: </strong><em>The Thing</em><strong><br />
When You Probably Saw It: </strong>In the early- to mid-80s, hopefully at a sleepover.<strong><br />
Comments: </strong>This wasn&#8217;t really scary, but it was definitely freaky. I know that with today&#8217;s special effects, monsters have gotten more and more elaborate and &#8220;scary,&#8221; but I was surprised how nasty this monster was. And they did this 30 years ago, so I imagine it was a disgustingly wonderful revelation then.<strong><br />
Rating: </strong>12/17. I liked it, but I&#8217;d have to wait a while before watching it again. Instead, I&#8217;ll just watch this awesome G.I. Joe stop-motion animation version; sure, it&#8217;s not exactly the same, but you get the gist of it in about six minutes:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/rT7AH4JyuNs" height="315" width="560" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/psycho-anthony-perkins-as-norman-bates.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-2603" alt="psycho-anthony-perkins-as-norman-bates" src="http://cinematicattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/psycho-anthony-perkins-as-norman-bates-1024x552.jpg" width="584" height="314" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Movie: </strong><em>Psycho</em><strong><br />
When You Probably Saw It: </strong>Any time between 1960 and now.<strong><br />
Comments: </strong>I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;d not seen this movie before. It was really good, and it didn&#8217;t have many of the things I don&#8217;t like about older movies (although it did have pointy bras and an over-acting psychologist who explains everything at the end by using unnatural hand gestures). Anthony Perkins was indeed great, too. I was surprised that such a simple premise could effectively fill a whole movie. Like <em>The Thing</em>, this must have been even more amazing when it first came out.<strong><br />
Rating: </strong>15/17</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What about you guys? Have you indeed seen these movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinematicattic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2600</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
